<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Could a butterfly in Brazil cause a twister in Texas?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.statsmadeeasy.net/2008/04/could-a-butterfly-in-brazil-cause-a-twister-in-texas/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.statsmadeeasy.net/2008/04/could-a-butterfly-in-brazil-cause-a-twister-in-texas/</link>
	<description>A wry look at all things statistical and/or scientific with an engineering perspective.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 07:58:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John King</title>
		<link>http://www.statsmadeeasy.net/2008/04/could-a-butterfly-in-brazil-cause-a-twister-in-texas/comment-page-1/#comment-40</link>
		<dc:creator>John King</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 17:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.statsmadeeasy.net/2008/04/could-a-butterfly-in-brazil-cause-a-twister-in-texas/#comment-40</guid>
		<description>James R. Thompson of Rice University, in his book &quot;Simulation, A Modeler&#039;s Approach&quot;, discusses Lorenz&#039;s work published in the Journal of Atmospheric Science in 1963.&lt;br/&gt; &lt;br/&gt;Lorentz was modeling weather with a system of three coupled non-linear differential equations. He found that very small changes in system initial conditions caused wildly divergent behavior of the system state as the system equations were solved further out in time. He proposed his findings as a reason for the poor results in making predictions of the weather. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Thompson was skeptical and used a &quot;discretized noisy version&quot; of the original model to test Lorenz&#039;s conclusions. He found that the addition of a small amount of noise resulted in stable and repeatable results rather than chaotic behavior. In this case, chaos was a probably a mathematical artifact and the addition of noise had a stabilizing effect on system behavior. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Thompson&#039;s conclusion? Physical processes such as weather are driven by large effects such as El Nino and jetstream currents. When realistically modeled they don&#039;t exhibit chaotic behavior, so the Butterfly effect probably isn&#039;t real.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James R. Thompson of Rice University, in his book &#8220;Simulation, A Modeler&#8217;s Approach&#8221;, discusses Lorenz&#8217;s work published in the Journal of Atmospheric Science in 1963.</p>
<p>Lorentz was modeling weather with a system of three coupled non-linear differential equations. He found that very small changes in system initial conditions caused wildly divergent behavior of the system state as the system equations were solved further out in time. He proposed his findings as a reason for the poor results in making predictions of the weather. </p>
<p>Thompson was skeptical and used a &#8220;discretized noisy version&#8221; of the original model to test Lorenz&#8217;s conclusions. He found that the addition of a small amount of noise resulted in stable and repeatable results rather than chaotic behavior. In this case, chaos was a probably a mathematical artifact and the addition of noise had a stabilizing effect on system behavior. </p>
<p>Thompson&#8217;s conclusion? Physical processes such as weather are driven by large effects such as El Nino and jetstream currents. When realistically modeled they don&#8217;t exhibit chaotic behavior, so the Butterfly effect probably isn&#8217;t real.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.statsmadeeasy.net/2008/04/could-a-butterfly-in-brazil-cause-a-twister-in-texas/comment-page-1/#comment-39</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 12:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.statsmadeeasy.net/2008/04/could-a-butterfly-in-brazil-cause-a-twister-in-texas/#comment-39</guid>
		<description>Chaos is what is behind the creation of residuals.  All of the butterflies, minnows, and bloggers typing are causing noise in all of my experiments.  So if everyone could just please hold completely still for the next 10 seconds ... ... Thank you, finally a run with no noise!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chaos is what is behind the creation of residuals.  All of the butterflies, minnows, and bloggers typing are causing noise in all of my experiments.  So if everyone could just please hold completely still for the next 10 seconds &#8230; &#8230; Thank you, finally a run with no noise!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

