<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A strange pink elephant — the Higgs boson</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.statsmadeeasy.net/2012/07/a-strange-pink-elephant-the-higgs-boson-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.statsmadeeasy.net/2012/07/a-strange-pink-elephant-the-higgs-boson-2/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=a-strange-pink-elephant-the-higgs-boson-2</link>
	<description>A wry look at all things statistical and/or scientific with an engineering perspective.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 May 2013 18:22:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Kvaalen</title>
		<link>http://www.statsmadeeasy.net/2012/07/a-strange-pink-elephant-the-higgs-boson-2/comment-page-1/#comment-111</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Kvaalen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2012 18:39:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.statsmadeeasy.net/?p=1203#comment-111</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s amazing how often you see the wrong explanation of what 5 sigmas means, even from science magazines like New Scientist. They say it means that there&#039;s a chance of 1 in so many million THAT the result is a fluke. Your Carl Bialik got it right.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s amazing how often you see the wrong explanation of what 5 sigmas means, even from science magazines like New Scientist. They say it means that there&#8217;s a chance of 1 in so many million THAT the result is a fluke. Your Carl Bialik got it right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
