Statisticians break down March Madness brackets (and rule things in general)


Before the first round of NCAA basketball playoffs a number of pundits favored my Minnesota team to upset UCLA—one of the commentators before the broadcast last night went so far as to say they were a “lock”.  Now I believe it.  (They won.)  However, I am doubtful they can beat Florida Sunday—gophers just do not stand a chance against gators.  For a more reasoned breakdown on the odds for Sunday and beyond, see this bracket filled out superstar statistician Nate Silver for the New York Times.

People who can crunch data like Silver are in big demand these days according to Wall Street Journal Numbers Guy Carl Bialik in his column on March 2.  The jobs site icrunchdata (very descriptive!) posted 28,305 openings for jobs in statistics and the like last month—up from 16,500 openings three years ago (I love data like this!).

It seems that number-herding nerds now rule, but there is a catch according to Dan Thorpe, senior director for analytics at Wal-Mart.  He says that “the bulk of the people coming out [with statistics degrees] are technically competent but they’re missing the consultative and the soft skills, everything else they need to be successful.”  So, which to do you prefer—good math skills (and lots of money) or an attractive personality (and many friends)?  My advice is to aim for some of both.

  1. No comments yet.

You must be logged in to post a comment.

%d bloggers like this: