An ideal world: Ballpark beer cost correlated completely with quality of baseball


Indian's lefty Laffer delivers a pitch to Twin's slugger Cuddyer

Indian's lefty Laffer delivers a pitch to Twin's slugger Cuddyer

When offered a free $149 seat behind home plate, I abandoned my desk last Wednesday for a matinee game between Minnesota and Cleveland.  It was dollar-a-dog day so I enjoyed a $2 lunch washed down by what the Wall Street Journal (9/11/09) considers to be one of the Major League’s best-valued beer.  They figure that the cost per ounce of brew – 27 cents at the Metrodome — should be based solely on the quality of the team.

The Twins have been consistent winners for some years and remain in the hunt for the Central Division of the American League after winning 2 out of 3 from the Detroit Tigers this weekend.  Nevertheless, they chronically play second-fiddle to East Coast teams like the Boston Red Sox.  WSJ reports that the crimson-hoser’s home field, Fenway Park, charges more than twice as much for beer for the Twins – far more than they merit by their winning percentage – a 46% overcharge, to be precise.  Boston fares poorly on price-to-value across the board according to this in-depth analysis by a blogger writing as “JinAZ” for Beyond the Box Score – a Saber*-Slanted Baseball Community.

However, being a lifelong fan of baseball, and having been to many ballparks around the League, but never Fenway, I’d gladly pay a premium to see the Red Sox some day.  (That explains why they can charge so much!)

*Referring to sabermetrics — a statistician specializing on baseball

, ,

  1. No comments yet.

You must be logged in to post a comment.

%d bloggers like this: