Archive for April, 2026

Believe it or not: Some dogs are as smart as a 5-year-old.

Emily Anthes, a science reporter for the New York Times, wrote a story early this year on how Dogs Build Their Vocabularies Like Toddlers. It featured an adorable picture of Miso, a 6-year-old male border collie from Canada, who knows the names of about 200 toys. She followed this up with an article this month In Defense of Dumb Dogs, confessing that her dog Watson is at the other end of the intelligence spectrum—knowing only the word “treat” and then needing to be led to it due to his poor hunting skills.

I found it very interesting that, though scientists figure that dogs may be on par cognitively with children between 1 and 3 years old, many owners claim that their pets are as smart as a 5-year-old. This is obviously a case of parental bias with dogs being treated as a member of the family, as evidenced by only 6% of owners in a 2025 YouGov survey admitting that their pet was below average. I love stats like this!

I have enjoyed dogs all my life and observed a surprisingly wide range of mental capability. My guess is that about half were below average. ; ) The smartest and best trained pets were a series of Springer Spaniels my father owned, all named “Dixie”—the last of which lives on after Dad passed away early last year at the age of 95. He loved to send his current Dixie off to play the piano. But none of the Dixie’s learned to sing like the beagle Buddy Mercury did.

Of course, canine intelligence varies greatly by breed. See a report by the American Kennel Club (AKC), updated April 6, for the top 20 results of a Study Measuring Canine Intelligence Ranks Breeds as the Smartest. I am not at all surprised to see the border collie being the “paws down” winner. While in Scotland years ago, I watched Bob and his owner demonstrate their sheep herding. It was amazing!

My favorite breed, the golden retriever, comes in at number 4. My wife and I owned two goldens—one (a male) being far more intelligent and fun than the other (a female), but both were adorable and great with our 5 kids. The springer spaniel achieved the #13 rank.

Another, older, list by the same scientist, Stanley Coren, starts off just a bit differently but goes on to rank a total of 100 dog breeds. Check it out here in this post by HubPages. I see that the beagle fared very poorly, though any dog that can play the piano and sing ranks highly in my estimation.

PS: Professor Coren attributes 51% of a dog’s intelligence to its genes and the other 49% to environmental circumstances. Such exactitude bothers me—I’d just say about half and half and suggest that a ‘nature-versus-nurture’ stat like this is very debatable. However, seeing how well my dad did with his dogs by nurturing them far more than me or my six younger siblings (all of us very jealous, ha ha), I am certain that environment makes a big difference in bringing out native intelligence.

,

No Comments

If you let AI do your job for you, you will be sorry

Yesterday I completed a mandatory 2 professional-development-hour (pdh) ethics class to renew my Minnesota Professional Engineer (PE) license. I chose one created this year to advise PEs on AI risk management and liability. The class included three very alarming case studies where AI ran amok—literally in one incident where a bot-driven road grader veered into a building. The take-home for us engineers—we remain responsible for our AI assistants, who must be verified and validated* before being deployed.

This schooling on maintaining control of AI comes on the heels of Claude—Anthropic’s AI—writing a blog post under my name after being trained on my keep-it-simple, make-it-fun (KISMIF) style. This was done as an experiment by a colleague, who based it on a webinar I presented a few years ago. Although done in an engaging manner and mostly correct statistically, I gave this writeup a hard pass going under my byline. This will happen only over my dead body (after that, I have no care about being ghost-written, ha ha). To avoid being branded as a Luddite,** I am open to derivations of content developed by me, provided this is acknowledged, e.g., “adapted from a webinar by Mark Anderson,” and edited by a person or persons with good writing skills and knowledge of the content (such as me).

By the way, our development team is benefitting greatly by Claude’s coding and generation of graphics for our next generation of Stat-Ease software. AI tools in the hands of experts always being on guard for hallucinatory behavior provide great leverage on the output of code. Likewise for writing, music and works of art, but is that a good thing or a bad thing? Debatable.

“AI won’t replace humans. But humans who use AI will replace those who don’t.”

– Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI—developer of ChatGPT

*To learn how these quality assurance aspects differ, read this April 3 post by Geeks for Geeks

**Though as suggested by Brookings, when it comes to AI, perhaps we should all be Luddites

No Comments

View of the ‘dark’ side of the moon enlightens many

I celebrated my golden birthday the day Neil Armstrong and crew took off to the moon on July 16, 1969. Those were exciting times for a teenage science nerd. But I think that the popularity of the 1973 opus (over 40 minutes!) “Dark Side of the Moon” brainwashed me into forgetting that the far side of the moon is not actually dark. Out of sight, out of mind!

When Artemis II took off, I thought about this for a few seconds and the lightbulb in my brain flickered back on. Every 30 days, or so,** those of us stuck here on Earth experience a New Moon—it becoming invisible by being completely shaded by the sun shining on the other side. Duh!

Here are some fun facts and statistics on Artemis II:

  • Liftoff occurred on April Fool’s Day under a full moon (loonie!)
  • Thrust at liftoff was 8.8 million pounds—the most powerful operational rocket (SpaceX Starship/Super Heavy V3, due for takeoff soon, will generate more than twice this thrust).
  • On April 6, the crew’s distance from Earth passed 248,655 miles, the record set in 1970.
  • The last time humans saw the far side of the moon was in December of 1972—over half a century ago.
  • Only about 20 percent of the far side was in sunlight during the flyby.
  • During their 7-hour flyby the crew saw six meteoroid impact flashes on the darkened lunar surface.

Of the more than 100 billion humans thought to have ever lived, the four astronauts aboard Artemis II have now ventured farther than any of them.

– Kenneth Chang, New York Times, reporting on 4/4/26 from Johnson Space Center in Houston

*As evidenced by this 2011 photo by NASA’s Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter

**To be precise, 29 days, 12 hours, and 44 minutes for one complete synodic month

No Comments